The Book of Marriage

Grounds that Constitute

Annulment of The Marriage

النِّكاَحِ

The Book of Dhihar

Glossary

Chapter on Defects that Constitute Grounds for the Annulment of Marriage 1272

1272. Introduction

In this chapter, Imam Ibn Qudâmah mentions the conditions that constitute grounds for one of the spouses to seek annulment of the marriage contract, as long as they are discovered only afterwards and were not disclosed by the time of the marriage contract. This is a right given to the spouses, who may or may not claim it. If they choose to, they may resolve the issue by mutually agreeing to separate. Litigation should be a last resort; still, the law should make provisions for that outcome. You will notice that there are two groups of conditions: those that prevent good companionship, like insanity, and those that prevent the attainment of sexual pleasure or cause physical aversion, like leprosy and impotence. (a) + (t) added the sterility of the man as grounds for annulment, and this position was later adopted by many Ḥanbalis such as Ibn Rajab and al-Mardâwi. They did not grant the same right to the man since he can have children from another wife.
Many chapters of fiqh mention individual examples, but it is more important to know the rationale behind the ruling than to memorize the specific examples. The examples may not be comprehensive, and they may change according to times and circumstances. (See the appendix on the change of fatwa.)
Are the Defects Limited to Specific Ones?

The four madh-habs agreed, in their formal positions, that they are limited. They disagreed over the exact conditions, with some making them five (H), seven (S), eight (A), thirteen (M), or sixteen (A2).

N.B.: The Ḥanafis say the right to annulment applies to women only if they find a defect in their husbands, since men can always divorce their wives. The majority contended that he may divorce, but if he seeks annulment, he will keep his ṣadâq unless they consummated the marriage. If they did, he cannot take it back from the woman, but he may demand that amount from her guardians who failed to inform him of the defect.
Some scholars, including az-Zuhri, Shurayḥ, Abu Thawr, Muhammad ibn al-Ḥasan, Ibn Taymiyah and Ibn al-Qayyim said they are not limited to those but include any defects that will cause justifiable aversion to the spouse (a). This position has great merits. In Zâd al-Ma‘âd, Imam Ibn al-Qayyim supports it by citing a report in Muṣannaf ‘Abdur-Razzâq that ‘Umar ordered a man to disclose his sterility to his wife and give her the choice; he argues that sterility is not even one of the defects named by the majority. Moreover, you should note that those who said they are fixed still disagreed widely over the individual defects.

باَبُ اْلعُيُوْبِ الَّتِيْ يُفْسَخُ بِهَا النِّكاَحُ

Whenever one of the two spouses finds the other to be owned, insane, or afflicted with vitiligo or leprosy; 1273 or if the man finds the woman to have an obstructed genital tract, or she finds him with a cutoff penis, they are entitled to annulment of the marriage, assuming that (the defect) was not known prior to the contract.

مَتَى وَجَدَ أَحَدُ الزَّوْجَيْنِ الآخر مَمْلُوْكاً، أَوْ مَجْنُوْناً، أَوْ مَجْذُوْمًا، أَوْ أَبْرَصَ، أَوْ وَجَدَهَا الرَّجُلُ رَتْقَاءَ، أَوْ وَجَدَتْهُ مَجْبُوْباً، فَلَهُ فَسْخُ النِّكَاحِ، إِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ عَلِمَ ذٰلِكَ.

Annulment is not permissible without a judicial ruling.

وَلاَ يَجُوْزُ اْلفَسْخُ إِلاَّ بِحُكْمِ حَاكِمٍ.

If the woman claims that her husband is impotent and does not get an erection with her, but he disputes that and claims to have not sought her yet, he will be given up to one year from the time of disputation. 1274 If he does not have intercourse with her by then, she will be given the choice of

وَإِنْ ادَّعَتِ الْمَرْأَةُ أَنْ زَوْجَهَا عِنِّيْنٌ لاَ يَصِلُ إِلَيْهَا، فَاعْتَرَفَ أَنَّهُ لَمْ يُصِبْهَا أُجِّلَ سَنَةً مُنْذُ تُرَافِعُهُ، فَإِنْ لَمْ يُصِبْهَا، خُيِّرَتْ فِي الْمَقَامِ مَعَهُ أَوْ فِرَاقِهِ.

When a defect is determined by the court to be repulsive, it should be sufficient grounds for annulment. In our times, for instance, being HIV positive should allow the uninformed spouse to seek separation.
In our times, some of the defects may be treatable, so the court should allow time for medical intervention. (See the appendix on the change of fatwa.)

1273. Vitiligo is a chronic disorder causing depigmented patches on the skin and its appendages.

1274. There are such reports from the Companions, including one from ‘Umar (RA) where he gave the husband one year to see if he would recover from his impotence. The scholars rationally justified this because the one year encompasses all four seasons, giving him a chance to recover from transient causes of impotence.
In our times, such cases should be referred to specialists, when available, for an expert opinion, which is a valid reference in the Islamic judiciary. This principle should be applied whenever warranted. Our great scholars (may Allah have mercy on them) spared no effort in seeking the expert opinions of their contemporaries, and we must do the same using our contemporary experts, not theirs.

staying with him or leaving him.

If she chooses to leave him, the ruler will separate them unless she knew of his impotence before her marriage or said, “I accept him as impotent” at any point in time.

فَإِنْ اخْتَارَتْ فِرَاقَهَ، فَرَّقَ اْلحَاكِمُ بَيْنَهُمَا، إِلاَّ أَنْ تَكُوْنَ قَدْ عَلِمَتْ عُنَّتَهُ قَبْلَ نِكَاحِهَا، أَوْ قَالَتْ: رَضِيْتُ بِهِ عِنِّيْنًا فِيْ وَقْتٍ.

If she comes to know about it after the contract, yet she abstains from seeking separation, she retains her right to do so. 1275 If he says, “She knew of my impotence, and she accepted me after that,” and she denies it, then the claim to be considered is hers. 1276

وَإِنْ عَلِمَتْ بَعْدَ اْلعَقْدِ وَسَكَتَتْ عَنِ الْمُطَالَبَةِ، لَمْ يَسْقُطْ حَقُّهَا. وَإِنْ قَالَ: قَدْ عَلِمَتْ عُنَّتِيْ أَوْ رَضِيَتْ بِيْ بَعْدَ عِلْمِهَا، فَأنْكَرَتْ فَاْلقَوْلُ قَوْلُهَا.

If he had intercourse with her once, he is not impotent. 1277 If he claims to have had intercourse with her, but she denies it: 1. If she was a virgin, she will be examined by trustworthy women, and their statement shall be accepted. 1278 2. If she was thayyib (non-virgin), his statement along with his oath shall be taken. 1279

وَإِنْ أَصَابَهَا مَرَّةً، لَمْ يَكُنْ عِنَّيْنًا.
وَإِنِ ادَّعَى ذٰلِكَ فَأَنْكَرَتْهُ: .٢.وَإِنْ كَانَتْ ثَيِّباً، فَاْلقَوْلُ قَوْلُهُ مَعَ يَمِيْنِهِ

1275. If she finds this out before the contract or after the consummation, she loses her right to subsequently demand separation. If she comes to know about it between the contract and the consummation, she retains this right unless she explicitly states her acceptance.

1276. He is the claimant (claiming that she knew of his impotence), and she is the denier. Therefore, her statement will be taken over his unless he can prove his claim.

1277. This does not mean that she must live with a man who does not satisfy her needs. A woman may ask for divorce due to harm, and if she is not granted that, she can obtain separation through khul‘ if she is truly resentful of her life with her husband.

1278. This does not mean that she must live with a man who does not satisfy her needs. A woman may ask for divorce due to harm, and if she is not granted that, she can obtain separation through khul‘ if she is truly resentful of her life with her husband.

فَصْلٌ: وَإِنْ عَتَقَتِ الْمَرْأَةُ وَزَوْجُهَا عَبْدٌ، خُيِّرَتْ فِيْ الْمُقَامِ مَعَهُ وَفِرَاقِهِ، وَلَهَا فِرَاقُهُ مِنْ غَيْرِ حُكْمِ حَاكِمٍ، فَإِنْ أُعْتِقَ قَبْلِ اختيارهَا أَوْ وَطْئِهَا بَطَلَ خِيَارُهَا، وَإِنْ عَتَقَ بَعْضُهَا، أَوْ عَتَقَ كُلُّهَا وَزَوْجُهَا حُرٌّ، فَلاَ خِيَارَ لَهَا.

1279. If the woman was previously married, and her new husband claims that he had intercourse with her, whereas she claims that he did not because of impotence, then examining her will not be helpful. It will be his statement against hers. Here, she is asking for the dissolution of marriage, while he is seeking its continuation, which is the default/status quo (al-aṣl). To depart from that default/status quo, proof is needed, so her claim will not be accepted unless she can prove it. He will need to take an oath in support of his statement. (A/SM): This is only when his impotence is not established by his admission or the testimony of experts (qualified physicians).

Grounds that Constitute Annulment of The Marriage

( Page : no 115)