He leaves behind one son and 100 (coins); then a man claims that the deceased owed him 100, and the son agrees with him. Then another man claims the same, and the son agrees with him as well. If both happen in the same session, the 100 will be divided between them; if they occur in two different sessions, the first man gets the 100, and the second is not entitled to anything.
If the first man claims that the 100 (coins) are his wadee‘ah (money he had deposited with the father for safekeeping), and the son concurs, and then another man claims the same 100 (coins as his wadee‘ah), and the son concurs with him as well, it will all be for the first, with nothing for the second. The son will have to compensate the second man since it was his first acknowledgment that caused this man to lose it. ¹⁷⁷¹

وَإِنْ خَلَّفَ ابْنًا وَمِئَةً، فَادَّعَى رَجُلٌ مِئَةً عَلىٰ أَبِيْهِ، فَصَدَّقَهُ، ثُمَّ ادَّعَى آخَرُ مِثْلَ ذٰلِكَ وَصَدَّقَهُ اْلاِبْنُ، فَإِنْ كَانَ فِيْ مَجْلِسٍ وَاحِدٍ، فَالْمِئَةُ بَيْنَهُمَا، وَإِنْ كَانَ فِيْ مَجْلِسَيْنِ، فَهِيَ لِلْأَوَّلِ وَلاَ شَيْءَ لِلثَّانِيْ.
وَإِنْ كَانَ اْلأَوَّلُ ادَّعَاهَا وَدِيْعَةً، فَصَدَّقَهُ اْلاِبْنُ، ثُمَّ ادَّعَاهَا آخَرُ، فَصَدَّقَهُ اْلاِبْنُ فَهِيَ لِلْأَوَّلِ، وَلاَ شَيْءَ لِلثَّانِيْ، وَيغَرْمُهَا لَهُ؛ لأَنَّهُ فَوَّتَهَا عَلَيْهِ بِإِقْرَارِهِ.